🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.